Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 31;30(4):494–501. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2015.30.4.494

Table 3. Comparisons of the Prevalence of Prognostic Factors between Preoperative PLR Quartile Groups.

Variable Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 P value
No. in quartile 266 266 266 268
PLR, range 13.32-103.85 104.01-125.96 126.0-155.97 156.25-407.81
Age, yr 52.93±10.62 49.56±11.26a 49.72±11.36a 48.62±11.25a <0.001
BMI, kg/m2 23.87±3.26 23.51±3.23 23.85±13.27 23.16±2.91 0.631
Tumor size, cm 0.87±0.60 0.86±0.60 0.88±0.59 0.84±0.55 0.914
TSH, mIU/L 1.37 (0.90-2.33) 1.32 (0.78-2.10) 1.42 (0.93-2.24) 1.32 (0.87-2.18) 0.212
T stage 3/4, % 33 (12.4) 24 (9.0) 33 (12.4) 32 (11.9) 0.554
LNM, % 159 (59.8) 154 (57.9) 166 (62.4) 155 (57.8) 0.675
Lateral LNM, % 8 (3.0) 18 (6.8) 25 (9.4) 14 (5.2) 0.018
Multifocality, % 90 (33.8) 70 (26.3) 82 (30.8) 78 (29.1) 0.287
ETE, % 96 (36.1) 100 (37.6) 120 (45.1) 96 (35.8) 0.092
LVI, % 46/177 (26.0) 43/168 (25.6) 52/182 (29.1) 49/188 (26.1) 0.865
BRAF V600E mutation, % 155/254 (61.0) 156/249 (62.7) 152/248 (61.3) 157/252 (62.3) 0.978

Values are expressed as mean±SD, median (interquartile range), or number (%). Statistical significance was tested by one-way analysis of variance, or the chi-square test.

PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte count ratio; BMI, body mass index; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; LNM, lymph node metastasis; ETE, extrathyroidal extension; LVI, lymphovascular invasion.

aThe differences were significant only between quartile group 1 and quartile group 2, 3, and 4 in post hoc analysis.