Table 1.

Re-analysis of Pennycook et al. (2014).

Dependant variable	Step	Age	Gender	Education	Income	Cognitive Reflection	Calculation	Numeracy
Religious Belief	Step 1	0.35	0.15	−0.09	−0.03
	Step 2	0.34	0.13	−0.08	−0.03	−0.19
	Step 3	0.34	0.13	−0.07	−0.03	−0.19	0.02
	Step 4	0.33	0.12	−0.07	−0.02	−0.18	0.03	−0.07
Traditional moral values	Step 1	0.14	<0.01	−0.14	0.06
	Step 2	0.14	−0.02	−0.12	0.07	−0.20
	Step 3	0.13	−0.01	−0.11	0.07	−0.21	0.04
	Step 4	0.13	−0.02	−0.11	0.07	−0.20	0.05	−0.07
Disgust−based moral judgments	Step 1	0.13	0.18	−0.15	0.15
	Step 2	0.13	0.14	−0.12	0.16	−0.25
	Step 3	0.13	0.14	−0.12	0.16	−0.25	−0.03
	Step 4	0.12	0.13	−0.11	0.17	−0.23	−0.02	−0.08

Stepwise regression results predicting religious belief, traditional moral values, and disgust-based moral judgments. In each case, Cognitive Reflection remains a statistically significant predictor after controlling for Calculation and Numeracy (Step 4). Cognitive Reflection = Proportion of correct responses that were not intuitive on the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005). Calculation = Proportion of non-intuitive CRT responses that were correct. Numeracy = Proportion correct on Schwartz et al. (1997) three-item test. See Supplementary Materials for further information on this study. Standardized beta coefficients. Gender: 1 = Male, 2 = Female. Significant independent predictors in bold (p < 0.05). N = 378.