Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec;5(6):322–331. doi: 10.1177/2045125315606027

Table 2.

Change from baseline to week 6 on efficacy measures (intent-to-treat population).

Outcome measure Lurasidone 20 mg/day(n = 71) Lurasidone 40 mg/day(n = 65) Lurasidone 80 mg/day(n = 70) Haloperidol 10 mg/day(n = 72) Placebo(n = 71)
BPRS
 LS mean change (SE) −5.0 (1.4) −5.2 (1.4) −8.0 (1.4) −9.8 (1.4) −7.9 (1.4)
p value versus placebo 0.357 0.437 0.999 0.747
PANSS
 LS mean change (SE) −7.1 (2.3) −7.2 (2.4) −13.6 (2.3) −16.0 (2.3) −12.3 (2.3)
p value versus placebo 0.109 0.126 0.694 0.252
CGI-S
 LS mean change (SE) −0.5 (0.1) −0.4 (0.1) −0.8 (0.1) −0.8 (0.1) −0.7 (0.1)
p value versus placebo 0.179 0.128 0.595 0.463
MADRS
 LS mean change (SE) −1.3 (0.97) −1.1 (1.0) −2.5 (0.98) −2.7 (0.96) −1.9 (0.97)
p value versus placebo 0.620 0.565 0.668 0.562

BPRS, brief psychiatric rating scale; CGI-S, clinical global impression-severity; LS, least squares; MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg depression rating scale; PANSS, positive and negative syndrome scale; SE, standard error.