Table 2.
Time/s | 0.000–0.025 | 0.025–0.050 | 0.050–0.075 | 0.075–0.100 | 0.100–0.125 | 0.125–0.150 | 0.150–0.175 | 0.175–0.200 | 0.200–0.225 | 0.225–0.250 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
False positives | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
True negatives | 172 | 168 | 169 | 168 | 166 | 165 | 165 | 167 | 165 | 165 |
True positives | 14 | 95 | 95 | 68 | 39 | 30 | 22 | 20 | 15 | 14 |
False negatives | 328 | 248 | 242 | 264 | 299 | 300 | 312 | 313 | 313 | 309 |
% Sensitivity | 4 | 28 | 28 | 20 | 12 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
% Specificity | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 100 |
% Accuracy | 36 | 51 | 52 | 47 | 41 | 39 | 37 | 37 | 36 | 37 |
Note that outlier responses were removed from the analysis. Outliers were defined as (1) did not trigger; (2) excessively noisy response resulting in atypical transient shape and (3) statistical outlier for each set of 12 sensors tested per sample, defined as outside 1.5x the interquartile range from the median current response