Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 16;4:259. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6670.1

Table S4. Comparison between PHENOstruct vs. other methods only leaf terms.

Subontology Method F-max Precision Recall mac-AUC
Organ PhenoPPIOrth 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.51
Struct->Dis->HPO 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.50
Binary SVMs 0.20 0.19 0.22 0.66
Clus-HMC-Ens 0.08 0.04 0.31 0.64
PHENOstruct 0.30 0.21 0.50 0.77
Inheritance PhenoPPIOrth 0.11 0.15 0.09 0.55
Struct->Dis->HPO 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.46
Binary SVMs 0.69 0.62 0.78 0.71
Clus-HMC-Ens 0.72 0.63 0.84 0.73
PHENOstruct 0.74 0.68 0.82 0.74
Onset PhenoPPIOrth 0.19 0.20 0.17 0.52
Struct->Dis->HPO 0.03 0.02 0.14 0.49
Binary SVMs 0.29 0.21 0.47 0.62
Clus-HMC-Ens 0.28 0.21 0.43 0.58
PHENOstruct 0.35 0.28 0.48 0.68

The performance is evaluated by using the exact annotations (i.e. only leaf terms) as ground truth. In other words, true-path rule is not applied. Performance is presented using macro AUC and protein-centric F-max, Precision and Recall as defined above.