Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 22;11(1):e0147536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147536

Table 2. Change (%) in AF management strategy at the end of the visit.

AF control and symptoms (on day of visit) Change (yes) “No strategy” to “strategy” Rhythm- to rate-control strategy Rate- to rhythm-control strategy Other change
AF controlled (n = 5704) 14.0 36.8 22.9 23.7 16.5
AF not controlled (n = 3961) 21.8 57.2 23.1 16.4 3.4
Sinus rhythm (n = 2559) 15.1 38.6 15.8 24.4 21.2
In AF with HR ≤80 bpm (n = 3145) 13.1 35.2 29.6 23.1 12.1
EHRA I (n = 2740) 14.8 42.6 23.6 21.7 12.1
EHRA ≥II (n = 7751) 17.5 48.9 22.8 19.6 8.7
AF not controlled, EHRA I (n = 706) 20.3 52.4 26.6 18.2 2.8
AF not controlled, EHRA > = II (n = 3245) 22.1 58.3 22.2 16.0 3.5

AF, atrial fibrillation; bpm, beats per minute; EHRA, European Heart Rhythm Association; HR, heart rate.