Table 1.
Study [Reference] | Year | Eligible subjects | Allele frequency (case) | Method | Population | Criteria | Gender (male), % | Age (years) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
case | control | S2 | T | C | Case | Control | Case | Control | |||||
Aalto-Setälä [12] | 1987 | 39 | 61 | 0.115 | - | - | PCR-RFLP | Finnish | CHD | 100 | 50.8 | 38-68 | 18-52 |
Bai [13] | 1995 | 90 | 68 | 0.328 | - | - | PCR-RFLP | Japanese | CHD | 77.8 | 57.4 | 63±12 | 58±12 |
Berkinbayev [14]a | 2014 | 161 | 112 | 0.242 | - | - | PCR | Kazakhstan(Kazakh) | MI | 100 | 100 | 46.4±1.9 | 40.7±2.1 |
Berkinbayev [14]b | 2014 | 80 | 95 | 0.285 | - | - | PCR | Kazakhstan(Uyghur) | CHD | 100 | 100 | 47.3±0.92 | 41.2±1.02 |
Bi [15] | 2005 | 312 | 317 | - | - | 0.452 | PCR-RFLP | Chinese(Han) | CAD | 67 | 60.3 | 60.2±13.3 | 58.9±14.3 |
Che [16] | 2012 | 78 | 78 | - | - | 0.647 | PCR-RFLP | Chinese | CAD | 57.7 | 52.6 | 45.3±4.7 | 44.3±7.6 |
Chen [17] | 2006 | 310 | 499 | - | 0.477 | 0.455 | PCR-RFLP | Chinese(Han) | CHD | 70.6 | 62.7 | 60.56±11.14 | 58.87±9.11 |
Chhabra [18] | 2004 | 158 | 151 | 0.342 | - | - | PCR | India | CAD | 88 | 92 | 53.25±10.25 | 52.45±10.85 |
Dallongeville [19] | 2006 | 442 | 475 | - | - | 0.263 | PCR | French | CHD | 100 | 100 | 35-64 | 35-64 |
Dan [20] | 1995 | 43 | 60 | 0.221 | - | - | PCR-RFLP | Chinese | CHD | N/A | N/A | 57.6-6.9 | 55.4-4.3 |
Ding [21] | 2012 | 229 | 254 | - | 0.548 | - | PCR | Chinese(Han) | ACS | 55.9 | 53.9 | 59.1±9.4 | 59.3±9.6 |
Han [22] | 2011 | 275 | 289 | - | - | 0.481 | PCR-RFLP | Chinese(Han) | CHD | 56.4 | 56.4 | 59.2±9.8 | 61.6±10.7 |
Izar [23] | 2003 | 112 | 112 | 0.136 | - | - | PCR | Brazil | CAD | 58 | 59 | M<45, W<55 | N/A |
Kee [24] | 1999 | 614 | 761 | 0.093 | - | - | PCR | Europe | MI | 100 | 100 | 25-64 | N/A |
Li [25] | 2006 | 47 | 104 | 0.274 | - | - | PCR-RFLP | Chinese(Han) | CAD, MI | 72.3 | 60.6 | 62.5±12.1 | 60.0±8.0 |
Liu [26] | 2004 | 385 | 373 | 0.116 | - | - | PCR-RFLP | Caucasian | MI | 100 | 100 | 60±9 | 59±9 |
Liu [27] | 2005 | 483 | 502 | 0.301 | 0.534 | 0.449 | PCR-RFLP | Chinese(Han) | CHD | 59 | 63.1 | 54.2±6.3 | 58.2±6.2 |
Liu [28] | 2005 | 267 | 491 | 0.301 | - | - | PCR-RFLP | Chinese(Han) | CHD | 70.4 | 63.7 | 60.3±8.9 | 58.8±9.2 |
Martinelli [29] | 2007 | 669 | 244 | - | - | - | PCR | Italy | CAD, MI | 81.3 | 75 | 60.7±9.3 | 58.7±12.7 |
Muendlein [30] | 2008 | 332 | 225 | - | - | 0.297 | PCR | Caucasian | CAD | 79.5 | 54.7 | 62.5±10.3 | 61.5±10.2 |
Olivieri [31] | 2002 | 549 | 251 | - | 0.416 | - | PCR | Northern Italy | CAD | 81.8 | 66.9 | 60.4±9.4 | 57.6±12.6 |
Ordovas [32] | 1991 | 202 | 145 | 0.125 | - | - | PCR-RFLP | Northern Italy | CAD | N/A | N/A | 47.2±8.8 | 49.6±6.9 |
Paulweber [33] | 1988 | 106 | 118 | 0.104 | - | - | PCR-RFLP | Austrian | CAD, MI | 100 | 100 | 47.3±5.7 | 49.7±5.4 |
Rigoli [34] | 1995 | 62 | 62 | 0.169 | - | - | PCR-RFLP | Southern Italy | CHD | 69.4 | 67.7 | 58.2±7.1 | 57.6±7.7 |
Sediri [35] | 2011 | 326 | 361 | 0.103 | 0.411 | - | PCR | Tunisia | MI | 100 | 100 | 53.8±8.6 | 51.1±9.5 |
Tarek [36] | 2013 | 156 | 154 | 0.292 | - | - | PCR-RFLP | Egyptian | CAD | 100 | 100 | 51.5±7.9 | 50.7±9.4 |
Tarek [37] | 2011 | 200 | 100 | 0.145 | - | - | PCR | Egyptian | MI | 67 | 64 | 50.7±9.5 | 52.9±11.3 |
Tobin [38] | 2004 | 547 | 505 | - | 0.355 | 0.255 | PCR-RFLP | UK | MI | 68 | 62 | 61.9±9.2 | 58.6±10.7 |
Weng [39] | 2000 | 50 | 50 | 0.16 | - | - | PCR | Chinese(Han) | CAD, MI | 76 | 74 | 57±6.8 | 55±8.7 |
Wu [40] | 2000 | 131 | 229 | 0.233 | - | - | PCR | Chinese | CAD | 69.5 | 56.8 | 59.1±10.9 | 51±15.3 |
Yang [41] | 2008 | 85 | 87 | - | - | 0.412 | PCR-RFLP | Chinese | CHD | 54.1 | 52.9 | 52.79±7.15 | 50.63±7.50 |
Yi [42] | 2006 | 195 | 181 | - | - | 0.541 | PCR-RFLP | Chinese (Han) | CAD | 56.4 | 56.4 | 69.48±9.21 | 58.63±14.79 |
Yu [43] | 2011 | 286 | 325 | - | 0.42 | 0.517 | TaqMan | Chinese (Han) | CHD | 74.8 | 52.9 | 56.30±11.57 | 55.79±12.40 |