Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 12;3(1):5–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2014.02.003

Table 2.

Recorded MRI findings and pain response at 2 and 6 months after RT (n=32).

MRI findings Pain response at 2 months
Pain response at 6 months
Non-responders Responders Non-responders Responders
Compression of medulla spinalis/cauda equinaa Yes (n=8) 7 1 6 2
No (n=23) 13 10 12 11



Nerve root compressionb Yes (n=15) 9 6 7 8
No (n=14) 9 5 9 5



Progression outside the RT fieldc Yes (n=19) 11 8 11 8
No (n=9) 7 2 5 4



Progression inside the RT fieldd Yes (n=2) 1 1 1 1
No (n=28) 17 11 16 12



Fracture progression Yes (n=17) 11 6 9 8
No (n=15) 9 6 9 6



New fractures Yes (n=5) 4 1 3 2
No (n=27) 16 11 15 12



Diffuse infiltration of bone marrow Yes (n=9) 8 1 7 2
No (n=23) 12 11 11 12



Large focal metastases (>75% of vertebral body involvement) Yes (n=24) 17 7 14 10
No (n=8) 3 5 4 4
a

Unable to estimate in 1 patient due to suboptimal image quality.

b

Uncertain findings in 3 patients due to image quality.

c

Unable to obtain in 4 patients due to incomplete examination (only lumbar spine, n=2) and diffuse infiltration of bone marrow (n=2).

d

Unable to obtain in 2 patients due to diffuse metastatic infiltration of bone marrow.