Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 28;27:194–210. doi: 10.1007/s13361-015-1271-2

Table 7.

Bacterial Identification at the Genus Level for the In-House Dataseta

Escherichia coli sample number 1-4, 9-12, and 21-26
Genus IF E[R] E[ln (E u)] E[WPC] E[NIP] E[NUP] E[CI]
Escherichia 14/14 1.4 –365.2 ± 290.4 42.1 115 1 1
Shigella 14/14 1.6 –349.6 ± 271.8 40.1 114 0 1
Enterobacter 2/14 5.0 –36.8 ± 24.4 5.1 18 0 1
Enterobacteriaceae 1/14 3.0 –13.9 ± 0.0 1.8 8 0 1
Citrobacter 1/14 4.0 –13.2 ± 0.0 1.5 6 0 1
Pseudomonas aeruginosa sample number 5-8, 13-16 and 27-28
Genus IF E[R] E[ln (E u)] E[WPC] E[NIP] E[NUP] E[CI]
Pseudomonas 10/10 1.0 –598.7 ± 647.8 71.3 102 34 1
Acidovorax 1/10 2.0 –23.0 ± 0.0 2.0 4 2 3
Azospira 5/10 4.2 –5.6 ± 8.3 1.2 2 0 3
Thiobacillus 1/10 2.0 –5.6 ± 0.0 1.0 2 1 5
Rothia 1/10 3.0 –4.8 ± 0.0 1.0 1 0 7
Salmonella enterica sample number 17-20
Genus IF E[R] E[ln (E u)] E[WPC] E[NIP] E[NUP] E[CI]
Salmonella 4/4 1.0 –232.1 ± 21.1 27.1 61 7 1
Haloferax 2/4 2.5 –7.2 ± 0.5 1.0 1 1 10
Pseudovibrio 1/4 2.0 –5.5 ± 0.0 1.0 1 0 11
Cupriavidus 4/4 2.8 –5.3 ± 2.5 1.1 2 1 6
Aliivibrio 3/4 4.0 –1.7 ± 2.3 0.8 2 0 4

a The numerical entries in the table are the expected values E[X]. The E[ln (E u)] it is followed by its standard deviation ± σ X