Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):20123–20134.

Table 1.

Comparison of clinicopathologic features between patients with different types of serosa

Normal type Reactive type Nodular type Colloid type Statistics P
Sex
    Male 27 42 35 25 χ2 = 3.068 0.381
    Female 15 20 30 19
Age (yrs) 57.81±10.77 62.40±11.26 60.12±11.02 59.73±12.49 F = 1.350 0.259
Tumor size (cm) 3.64±1.41 4.65±1.66 5.05±1.69 6.02±2.72 F = 11.787 0.000
Tumor site
    Colon 19 21 31 26 χ2 = 6.785 0.079
    Rectum 23 41 34 18
Tumor gross type
    Protruded 26 8 15 3 χ2 = 76.599 0.000
    Ulceration 16 54 30 30
    Infiltrative 0 0 20 11
Histological type
    Non-MUC 36 55 53 9 χ2 = 73.156 0.000
    MUC 6 7 12 35
Histological grade
    Well 24 10 10 2 χ2 = 71.556 0.000
    Moderately 16 52 49 27
    Poorly 2 0 6 15
Tumor necrosis
    Yes 6 43 38 18 χ2 = 33.999 0.000
    No 36 19 27 26
UICC T stage
    T1/T2 26 5 0 0 χ2 = 116.158 0.000
    T3 16 47 38 22
    T4 0 10 27 22
Number of nodes retrieved 20.00±17.10 19.58±8.56 22.26±8.56 24.64±10.61 F = 2.127 0.098
Number of nodes metastasis 1.62±4.10 2.16±4.08 5.86±6.94 9.18±10.12 χ2 = 42.420* 0.000
LNM ratio (%) 8.15±19.06 12.05±21.05 24.74±27.91 37.31±33.90 χ2 = 38.163* 0.000
UICC N stage
    N0 32 35 23 8 χ2 = 47.222 0.000
    N1 6 18 11 12
    N2 4 9 31 24
UICC M stage
    M0 42 53 52 31 χ2 = 14.537 0.002
    M1 0 9 13 13
Peritoneal metastasis
    Yes 0 0 3 10 χ2 = 28.229 0.000
    No 42 62 62 34
*

Kruskal-Wallis test of mean ± SD.

MUC: Mucinous adenocarcinoma; LNM: Lymph node metastasis.