Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):20454–20462.

Table 2.

Results of meta-analysis for PTGS2 rs20417 polymorphism and PCa risk

Study groups Comparisons Main effects of rs20417 polymorphism on PCa risk Analysis model Total (case/control)

OR (95% CI) Ph I2 (%)
All 10 12326/14027
    CC vs. GG 9 1.00 (0.87, 1.15) 0.962 0 Fixed
    CC + GC vs. GG 10 1.01 (0.96, 1.06) 0.585 0 Fixed
    CC vs. GC + GG 9 0.99 (0.86, 1.14) 0.952 0 Fixed
    C vs. G 10 1.01 (0.96, 1.06) 0.542 0 Fixed
    GC vs. GG 10 1.01 (0.96, 1.07) 0.528 0 Fixed
Ethnicity 359/359
    African 2
    CC vs. GG 2 0.93 (0.44, 1.95) 0.616 0 Fixed
    CC + GC vs. GG 2 0.95 (0.66, 1.35) 0.721 0 Fixed
    CC vs. GC + GG 2 0.89 (0.43, 1.82) 0.528 0 Fixed
    C vs. G 2 0.94 (0.69, 1.29) 0.919 0 Fixed
    GC vs. GG 0.94 (0.64, 1.39) 0.564 0 Fixed
Caucasian 6 11554/12982
    CC vs. GG 5 1.01 (0.87, 1.17) 0.821 0 Fixed
    CC + GC vs. GG 6 1.02 (0.96, 1.07) 0.854 0 Fixed
    CC vs. GC + GG 5 1.00 (0.87, 1.16) 0.848 0 Fixed
    C vs. G 6 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) 0.789 0 Fixed
    GC vs. GG 6 1.02 (0.96, 1.07) 0.858 0 Fixed
Asian 2 413/686
    CC vs. GG 1 0.85 (0.34, 2.10) . . Fixed
    CC + GC vs. GG 2 0.88 (0.65, 1.19) 0.031 78.6 Fixed
    CC vs. GC + GG 1 0.79 (0.32, 1.94) . . Fixed
    C vs. G 2 0.87 (0.66, 1.06) 0.033 77.9 Fixed
    GC vs. GG 2 0.89 (0.64, 1.22) 0.023 80.7 Fixed
Source of controls
    Population 7 11952/13599
    CC vs. GG 6 1.01 (0.87, 1.17) 0.902 0 Fixed
    CC + GC vs. GG 7 1.01 (0.96, 1.06) 0.424 0 Fixed
    CC vs. GC + GG 6 1.01 (0.87, 1.16) 0.917 0 Fixed
    C vs. G 7 1.01 (0.96, 1.06) 0.363 8.6 Fixed
    GC vs. GG 7 1.01 (0.95, 1.06) 0.403 3.0 Fixed
Hospital 2 285/340
    CC vs. GG 1 0.85 (0.34, 2.10) . . Fixed
    CC + GC vs. GG 2 1.19 (0.81, 1.75) 0.349 0 Fixed
    CC vs. GC + GG 1 0.79 (0.32, 1.94) . . Fixed
    C vs. G 2 1.13 (0.80, 1.58) 0.331 0 Fixed
    GC vs. GG 2 1.27 (0.84, 1.91) 0.369 0 Fixed