Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):20679–20689.

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies comparing LH and OH to treat HCC patients with liver cirrhosis

Study Study design No. of patients Mean age, y Child-Pugh (A/B) Convention to open, (n, %)

LH (M, %) OH (M, %) LH OH LH OH
Belli et al. R 54 (31, 57.4%) 125 (78, 62.4%) 63.3±6.1* 61.5±7.8 49/5 117/8 4, 7.0%
Cheung et al. RM 32 (22, 68.8%) 64 (50, 78.1%) 59.5 (39-79)** 61 (29-82) 32/0 62/4 3, 18.8%
Kanazawa et al. R 28 (16, 57.1%) 28 (17, 60.7%) 69 (40-85) 68 (29-82) 20/8 21/7 3, 10.7%
Memeo et al. RM 45 (37, 82.2%) 45 (35, 77.8%) 60 (43-80) 62 (34-75) 43/2 44/1 NA
Siniscalchi et al. R 23 (15, 65.2%) 133 (104. 78.2%) 57.9 (30-73) 63.3 (41-77) NA NA NA
Truant et al. RM 36 (31, 86.1%) 53 (47, 88.7%) 60.6±10.2 63.3±7.6 36/0 53/0 7, 19.4%
Yamashita et al. R 63 (48, 76.2%) 99 (74, 74.7%) 67.5±9.5 65.2±10.1 59/4 96/3 NA

Abbreviations: LH = laparoscopic hepatectomy; OH = open hepatectomy; R = retrospective study; RM = retrospective matching study; NA = not available.

*

Mean ± SD.

**

Median (range).