Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 22;13:8. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0116-y

Table 5.

Test-retest reliability parameters for subgroup 1 (n = 11) without support of the non-affected arm

Subgroup 1 (n = 11) VPIT test performance without support
VPIT parameters Test Mean ± SD Retest Mean ± SD Test-Retest Mean difference ± SD Kendall’s tau correlation Kendall’s tau correlation with transformed data ICC (95 % CI) SEM agreement SDD SDD%
Tex [s] 113.14 ± 64.54 83.56 ± 27.26 29.57 ± 61.17 .19a 0.31c 0.35 (−0.90–0.81) 37.01 102.50 682.87
Ndp 0.12 ± 0.23 0.12 ± 0.23 0.0 ± 0.34 0.0 - 0.25 (−6.04–0.69) 0.20 0.55 3.66
Fg go [N] 10.49 ± 4.84 10.13 ± 4.09 0.36 ± 3.4 0.20a 0.24c 0.84 (0.40–0.96) 1.79 4.95 32.97
Fg return [N] 1.74 ± 0.92 1.55 ± 1.22 0.19 ± 0.93 0.13a 0.13d 0.78 (0.18–0.94) 0.50 1.39 9.26
Nzc [1/s] go 11.18 ± 1.79 10.79 ± 1.97 0.39 ± 1.21 0.06 - 0.89 (0.60–0.97) 0.62 1.73 11.53
Nzc [1/s] return 11.72 ± 1.91 10.80 ± 1.83 0.92 ± 1.29 0.09 - 0.82 (0.28–0.95) 0.79 2.20 14.66
Etraj go [cm] 0.56 ± 0.27 0.47 ± 0.15 0.09 ± 0.20 0.16a 0.10b,c 0.70 (0.00–0.92) 0.12 0.32 2.13
0.29 ± 0.18c 0.35 ± 0.15c 0.06 ± 0.11c 0.83 (0.38–0.95)c 0.07c 0.19c 1.27c
Etraj return [cm] 0.79 ± 0.28 0.75 ± 0.35 0.04 ± 0.42 0.06 - 0.18 (−2.80–0.80) 0.29 0.79 5.26
Fcmean [N] 1.08 ± 0.72 1.18 ± 0.66 −0.10 ± 0.52 0.02 - 0.84 (0.41–0.96) 0.28 0.77 5.13

aΤ > 0.1, Ttrans decreasedb, c = log10 transformed, d = square root transformed

T ex [s] execution time in seconds, N dp number of dropped pegs during transport, F g (go/return) [N] mean grasping force of the three force sensors integrated into the handle in Newton, N zc [1/s] (go/return) number of zero-crossings of the acceleration, E traj [cm]: trajectory error, F cmean [N] mean collision force, SD Standard Deviation, ICC Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, CI Confidence Interval, SEM Standard Error of Measurement, SDD Smallest Detectable Difference