Table 4.
Without expenditure | With expenditure | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008–2009 | 2009–2010 | 2010–2011 | Mean | 2008–2009 | 2009–2010 | 2010–2011 | Mean | |
Marmquist productivity index | ||||||||
Battambang | 1.400 | 1.390 | 1.073 | 1.248 | 1.285 | 1.392 | 1.092 | 1.219 |
Kampang Cham | 1.233 | 1.190 | 0.938 | 1.091 | 1.180 | 1.190 | 0.924 | 1.068 |
Kampot | 1.242 | 1.193 | 0.916 | 1.053 | ||||
Kandal | 1.046 | 1.126 | 0.998 | 1.042 | 1.019 | 1.075 | 1.028 | 1.025 |
Stung Treng | 0.817 | 1.106 | 1.170 | 1.019 | 0.689 | 1.020 | 1.170 | 0.937 |
Total | 1.175 | 1.233 | 0.974 | 1.092 | 1.128 | 1.186 | 1.004 | 1.080 |
Technical progress in sector | ||||||||
Battambang | 1.167 | 1.149 | 1.087 | 1.127 | 1.123 | 1.139 | 1.057 | 1.100 |
Kampang Cham | 1.149 | 1.075 | 0.977 | 1.058 | 1.109 | 1.049 | 0.969 | 1.035 |
Kampot | 0.978 | 1.046 | 0.930 | 0.975 | ||||
Kandal | 1.137 | 1.042 | 0.937 | 1.033 | 1.079 | 1.015 | 0.959 | 1.014 |
Stung Treng | 0.909 | 1.243 | 0.957 | 1.026 | 0.872 | 1.025 | 1.024 | 0.971 |
Total | 1.121 | 1.095 | 0.985 | 1.059 | 1.092 | 1.055 | 0.987 | 1.039 |
Technical efficiency change | ||||||||
Battambang | 1.170 | 1.244 | 0.986 | 1.109 | 1.111 | 1.256 | 1.033 | 1.110 |
Kampang Cham | 1.074 | 1.112 | 0.957 | 1.032 | 1.072 | 1.140 | 0.949 | 1.033 |
Kampot | 1.289 | 1.183 | 0.984 | 1.082 | ||||
Kandal | 0.922 | 1.083 | 1.063 | 1.009 | 0.949 | 1.060 | 1.071 | 1.011 |
Stung Treng | 0.899 | 0.890 | 1.223 | 0.993 | 0.790 | 0.996 | 1.143 | 0.965 |
Total | 1.045 | 1.137 | 0.989 | 1.031 | 1.027 | 1.132 | 1.015 | 1.039 |