Table 3. Frequencies of participants who identified at least one close social network member with characteristics specified in the modified General Social Survey Social Network Module by low and high social network diversity a.
Total (N=34) | Low (N=15) | High (N=19) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||
Nb | %c | Nb | % c | Nb | % c | |
Number of close network members, mean (SD) | 1.8 (0.9) | 2.0 (0.8) | 1.6 (1.0) | |||
Sex | ||||||
Male | 19 | 55.9 | 9 | 60.0 | 10 | 52.6 |
Female | 25 | 73.5 | 10 | 66.7 | 15 | 79.0 |
Relationship of network member | ||||||
Spouse/partner | 9 | 26.5 | 3 | 20.0 | 6 | 31.6 |
Boyfriend | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Sibling | 13 | 38.2 | 4 | 26.7 | 9 | 47.4 |
Parent | 5 | 14.7 | 3 | 20.0 | 2 | 10.5 |
Friend | 3 | 8.8 | 2 | 13.3 | 1 | 5.3 |
Co-worker | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Neighbor | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Children | 11 | 32.4 | 4 | 26.7 | 7 | 37.8 |
Other | 10 | 29.4 | 3 | 20.0 | 7 | 36.8 |
Person lives within 20 blocks of home | ||||||
Yes | 25 | 73.5 | 9 | 60.0 | 16 | 84.2 |
No | 19 | 55.9 | 8 | 53.3 | 11 | 57.9 |
Frequency of contact | ||||||
Daily | 26 | 76.5 | 10 | 66.7 | 16 | 84.2 |
2-3 times a week | 6 | 17.7 | 1 | 6.7 | 5 | 26.3 |
Once a week | 3 | 8.8 | 2 | 13.3 | 1 | 5.3 |
2-3 times a month | 1 | 2.9 | 1 | 6.7 | 0 | 0.0 |
Once a month | 2 | 5.9 | 1 | 6.7 | 1 | 5.3 |
Once every few months | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Shared activities | ||||||
Eat a meal or snack | 26 | 76.5 | 9 | 60.0 | 17 | 89.5 |
Shop for food together | 16 | 47.1 | 5 | 33.3 | 11 | 57.9 |
Cook or prepare meals together | 15 | 44.1 | 5 | 33.3 | 10 | 52.6 |
Go for a walk, hike or bike rides | 8 | 23.5 | 3 | 20.0 | 5 | 26.3 |
Exercise together | 6 | 17.7 | 3 | 20.0 | 3 | 15.8 |
Watch TV or go to the movies | 17 | 50.0 | 6 | 40.0 | 11 | 57.9 |
Other | 16 | 47.1 | 7 | 46.7 | 9 | 47.4 |
Social network diversity was dichotomized by the median for the sample. Low = sumscore <5.0 and high = sumscore ≥ 5.0
N and percents refer to the number of women who identified at least one close network member with a particular characteristic.
Percents do not sum to 100 because women could identify up to three close network members and may have identified more than one network member with similar or different characteristics.