Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 27;8(1):27–40. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i1.27

Table 3.

Complies the characteristics of all trials which evaluated frailty in patients undergoing hepato-pancreatico-biliary resections

Ref. Country Quality score1 Study design Sample size Age (yr) Male sex (%) Surgery type Parameter used to define frailty Postoperative complication rate Follow-up (mo) 30-d morbidity (%) 30-d mortality (%) 1-yr OS (%) 5-yr OS (%) Outcome parameter Frailty/outcome (OR)
Harimoto et al[40] Japanese 6 R 186 67 40 Partial hepatectomy HCC L3 muscle area NR 60 NR NR NR 71 5 yr survival OR = 0.9; 95%CI: 0.84-093, P = 0.002
van Vledder et al[41] The Netherlands 5 R 196 65 61 Liver resection for CRLM Skeletal muscle mass NR 29 NR NR 94 43 Overall survival OR = 14.4; 95%CI: 18.76-31.2
Valero et al[42] United States 7 R 96 62 61 Liver resection liver transplantation Total psoas area and total psoas volume 29 26 NR NR 82 47 Complication rate OR = 3.06; 95%CI: 1.07-8.52, P = 0.003
Englesbe et al[43] United States 5 R 163 53 NR Liver transplantation Total psoas area and psoas density NR 36 NR NR NR NR Overall survival rate OR = 0.27; 95%CI: 0.11-0.33, P = 0.001
Waits et al[44] United States 8 R 348 51 62 Liver transplantation Total psoas area and psoas density and age - summarized in new parameter "monomorphometric age" NR 60 NR NR 85 59 1 and 5 yr survival OR = 1.04; 95%CI: 1.03-1.06, P = 0.001
Masuda et al[76] Japanese 5 R 2014 48 50 Living donor liver transplantation Total psoas area 18 60 NR NR 75 89 1 and 5 yr survival OR = 2,06; 95%CI: 1.1-4.2, P = 0.05
Kaido et al[32] Japanese 6 P 124 54 NR Living donor liver transplantation Skeletal muscle mass and bioimpedance analysis NR 60 NR NR 80 73 1 and 5 yr survival OR = 4.85; 95%CI: 2.092-11.79, P = 0.001
Peng et al[46] United States 6 R 259 68 60 Liver resection for CRLM Total psoas area 10 60 NR NR 65 26 Postoperative complications OR = 3.1; 95%CI: 1.14-8.29, P = 0.02
Amini et al[47] United States 7 R 763 67 57 Pancreatic resection Total psoas area and total psoas volume 48 24 0.5 48 76 24 Postoperative complications OR = 1.79; 95%CI: 1.15-2.56, P = 0.002
Dale et al[33] United States 9 P 76 67 55 Pancreaticoduodenectomy Fried’s criteria, Short Physical Performance Battery, Vulnerable Elderly Survey 80 1 4 21 NR NR Postoperative complications OR = 4.06, P = 0.01
Joglekar et al[48] United States 6 R 118 65 75 Pancreatic resection Total psoas index and psoas density 78 3 NR 23 NR NR Postoperative complications OR = 2.78; 95%CI: 2.28-22, P = 0.02
Peng et al[45] United States 6 R 557 66 53 Pancreatic resection Total psoas area 47 36 NR NR 62 3 a OS: 36 3 yr OS OR = 1.68; 95%CI: 1.32-2.11; P = 0.001
1

According to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale ranging from 1 to 9 stars. Age and OS are presented as median values unless indicated otherwise. NR: Not reported; OS: Overall survival; OR: Odds ratio; P: Prospective trial; P/R: Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data; R: Retrospective trial.