Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 8;4:2050312115622857. doi: 10.1177/2050312115622857

Table 5.

Sensitivity analysis of kappa agreements for self-reported type 1 (age at diagnosis: <35 years) and type 2 diabetes diagnoses (age at diagnosis: >44 years).

Diabetes type Test study Retest study Consistency (%)a Kappa (95% CI)
Cases in 1991 (n) Cases in 1998 (n)
Type 1 diabetesb 88 81 68/88 (77.3) 0.80 (0.65–0.95)
Type 2 diabetesc 12 15 6/12 (50.0) 0.52 (0.27–0.77)
Cases in 1991 (n) Cases in 2005 (n)
Type 1 diabetesb 88 74 54/88 (61.4) 0.69 (0.51–0.88)
Type 2 diabetesc 12 12 3/12 (25.0) 0.33 (0.05–0.61)
Cases in 1998 (n) Cases in 2005 (n)
Type 1 diabetesb 81 74 57/81 (70.4) 0.60 (0.38–0.81)
Type 2 diabetesc 129 123 75/129 (58.1) 0.63 (0.56–0.70)

CI: confidence interval.

a

Consistency(%)=Number of diabetes diagnosis in both test and retest studyNumber of diabetes diagnosis in test study×100.

b

Only those reporting age at diagnosis <35 years were included.

c

Only those reporting age at diagnosis >44 years were included.