Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;113(3):542–547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517545113

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Prominent shear stress peaks due to accelerating or suddenly arrested frictional rupture fronts. (A) Nineteen rosette strain gauges (blue squares), mounted at y3.5 mm measure the three 2D strain tensor components simultaneously every 1 μs. These are synchronized with real contact area, A(x,t), measurements. (B, Top) A(x,t) evolution (normalized at nucleation time, t=0), along the quasi-1D interface due to a rupture front that nucleated at x0, rapidly accelerated to CR, and transitioned to supershear at x155 mm. (Bottom) Shear strain variations, Δεxy=εxyεxyr, relative to the rupture tip arrival time, ttip, at the two locations, x1 (red) and x2 (blue) denoted above, show prominent amplitude shear strain peaks preceding the rupture tip arrival. For simplicity, we refer to these peaks as ‟shear stress peaks.” εxyr are residual values after the rupture front’s passage. Successive measurements (black points in upper panel) reveal that these peaks propagate at CS, and trigger supershear rupture. (C) Measurements of εxy (Bottom) and the contact area (Top) reveal an inverted shear peak propagating at CS long after rupture arrest. Extrapolation (solid line) indicates that its origin coincides with rupture arrest. Arrest is due to decreasing values of εxy0 with x (22, 24). (Bottom) εxy measurements at three spatial points denoted above. The red (green) y axis is shifted by 0.06103 (0.06103) relative to initial values, εxy0, for clarity. Black points in upper panels are measured peak locations.