Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;113(3):526–531. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516312113

Table 1.

Observed 1990 to present trends in atmospheric Hg0 concentrations and HgII wet deposition fluxes since the 1990s

Period Location (network) Trend, % y−1a Source
Atmospheric Hg0 concentrations
 1995 to 2010 Canada (CAMNet) −1.6 ± 0.8b,c Ref. 7
 1996 to 2004 Cape Point, South Africa −1.3 ± 0.3c,d Ref. 11
 1990 to 1996 Wank, Germany −6.1 ± 1.1c,d Ref. 12
 1996 to 2013 Mace Head, Ireland −1.3 ± 0.2c,e Ref. 13
 1990 to 2009 North Atlantic, cruises −2.5 ± 0.5c,d Ref. 6
South Atlantic Not significant
 2000 to 2009 Alert, Canada −0.9 ± 0.5f,g Ref. 28
Zeppelin, Norway Not significant
 2008 to 2013 United States (AMNet) Not significantc,e This study
 2005 to 2013 Experimental Lakes Area, Canada −2.2 ± 0.6c,e This study
 1990 to 2011 Western Europe (EMEP) −2.1 ± 0.5c,e This study
 1994 to 2012 North of 60° N Not significantc,e This study
 2005 to 2014 Free troposphere (CARIBIC) Not significantc,e,h This study
 2002 to 2013 Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii Not significantc,d Ref. 14
HgII wet deposition
 1996 to 2008 North America (MDN) Not significantc,i Ref. 9
Western Europe (EMEP) −1.5 ± 0.5
 1998 to 2005 Northeast United States (MDN) −1.7 ± 0.5c,j Ref. 15
Midwest United States −3.5 ± 0.7
Southeast United States Not significant
 1996 to 2005 Northeast United States (MDN) −2.1 ± 0.9g,k,l Ref. 8
Midwest United States −1.8 ± 0.3
Southeast United States −1.3 ± 0.3
West United States −1.4 ± 0.4
 2002 to 2008 Northeast United States (MDN) Not significantg,l Ref. 16
Midwest United States Not significant
 2004 to 2010 Northeast United States (MDN) −4.1 ± 0.5c,m Ref. 26
Midwest United States −2.7 ± 0.7
Southeast United States Not significant
Western United States Not significant
 1996 to 2013 North America, MDN −1.6 ± 0.3c,j,n This study
 1990 to 2012 Western Europe, EMEP −2.2 ± 0.6
a

All trends reported are statistically significant (P < 0.05). Data from multiple sources are not synchronous; thus we present snapshots of changes over multiple years and regions where data are available.

b

Trends were calculated for sites with >5 y of measurements by using monthly median concentrations with the requirement that 75% of the month had valid data.

c

Based on linear regression.

d

Annual median concentrations.

e

Monthly median concentrations.

f

Daily averaged concentrations.

g

Seasonal Kendall Test and Sen’s slope method.

h

Stratospheric data and biomass burning plumes filtered based on potential vorticity and CO and ozone concentrations (details provided in methods).

i

Trend were calculated for monthly mean wet deposition fluxes of sites with at least 75% data coverage.

j

Annual wet deposition fluxes are used.

k

Trends are calculated for sites with >5 y of data and >75% valid data coverage.

l

Weekly wet deposition fluxes were used.

m

Trends are calculated for sites with >75% data coverage. Monthly precipitation volume-weighted mean concentrations were used.

n

Sites with at least 10 and 7-y data coverage are selected for MDN and EMEP networks, respectively.