Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 13;6:19253. doi: 10.1038/srep19253

Table 2. Results from the principal component analysis after Oblimin rotation with Kaiser normalisation.

Behavioural Variable Confidence Physical Engagement Social Engagement Aggression
V. Flight distance 0.80 −0.12 −0.04 0.04
V. Secondary response 0.82 0.00 −0.12 −0.14
V. Lasting effect 0.78 −0.01 −0.18 0.14
G. Fearfulness 0.65 0.07 −0.17 0.64
G. Secondary response 0.57 0.16 −0.19 0.35
G. Lasting effect 0.66 0.26 −0.32 0.23
Metal stair −0.13 0.50 0.05 0.42
Reaction on table −0.06 0.75 −0.08 −0.03
Object 0.01 0.80 −0.13 −0.07
Affability 0.11 0.17 0.86 0.10
Handling 0.05 0.07 0.86 0.20
Leash 0.19 0.25 0.83 0.16
Reaction in dark room 0.17 −0.17 0.66 0.10
V. Aggression −0.15 0.04 −0.19 0.77
G. Aggression 0.41 −0.11 −0.14 0.70
Tug-of-war 0.15 0.48 −0.14 −0.03
Chasing −0.02 0.26 −0.17 −0.06
Interest in object 0.09 0.05 −0.20 0.20
A. Flight distance 0.46 −0.02 0.12 0.11
A. Secondary response 0.18 0.06 0.11 0.10
A. Lasting effect 0.29 0.18 −0.13 −0.09
Search Intensity 0.17 0.28 −0.06 0.01
Search Persistence 0.25 0.28 −0.13 −0.07
Gun-shot Fear 0.03 0.32 −0.36 0.30
Gun-shot Curiosity −0.04 0.25 0.19 0.12
% Variance explained 21.7 13.4 11.1 6.8

The table shows the SAF T-test variable loadings of the first four of the six components with eigenvalues >1. Loadings above 0.5 are shown in bold. A – acoustic startle sub-test; G – gradual visual startle sub-test; V – visual startle sub-test. The total variance explained by these four factors is 53.1%. N = 76.