Table 4. The results of ANVOAs testing the effect of tDCS on log contrast sensitivity.
| ANOVA factor(s) | AME vs. FEE | AME vs. Control | FFE vs. Control | Control 10 vs. 20 min |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stimulation | F2, 40 = 12.364, p < 0.001 | F2, 72 = 24.798, p < 0.001 | F2, 72 = 11.069, p < 0.001 | F2, 58 = 26.909, p < 0.0001 |
| Time | F2, 40 = 0.997, p = 0.378 | F2, 72 = 0.326, p = 0.723 | F2, 72 = 2.067, p = 0.134 | F2, 58 = 2.174, p = 0.128 |
| Eye | F1, 20 = 4.381, p = 0.049 | |||
| Stimulation*Time | F4, 80 = 3.516, p = 0.011 | F4, 144 = 0.473, p = 0.755 | F4, 144 = 1.657, p = 0.163 | F2, 116 = 0.156, p = 0.960 |
| Stimulation*Eye | F2, 40 = 0.936, p = 0.4 | |||
| Stimulation*Time*Eye | F4, 80 = 0.321, p = 0.863 | |||
| Stimulation*Eye (between-subjects factor) | F2, 72 = 0.056, 0.946 | F2, 72 = 0.796, p = 0.455 | ||
| Stimulation*tDCS Duration (between-subjects factor) | F2, 58 = 0.102, p = 0.903 |
Data reported as in Table 2.