Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 13;6:19344. doi: 10.1038/srep19344

Figure 3. Feeding behaviors of pea aphids fed on different host plants measured by electrical penetration graph technique.

Figure 3

E1, watery salivation. E2, passive ingestion. C, probing plant cells. F, derailed stylet. G, drinking from xylem. np, non-probing. Time ratios (time spent in each waveform divided by 5 h) were reported as mean ± SEM. (A) Comparison of feeding behavior of the YYC clone before and after a short-term shift to Medicago truncatula, Vicia villosa, or Medicago sativa. Different letters above columns indicates a significant difference of the same waveform in different groups evaluated by ANOVA using SPSS 17.0. (B) Comparison of feeding behavior of the YYC clone after a short-term shift to M. truncatula for 5 h and after a long-term acclimation on M. truncatula for six months. ***P < 0.001. (C) Comparison of feeding behavior of the YYC clone after a short-term shift to V. villosa for 5 h and after a long-term acclimation on V. villosa for six months. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001. (D) Model diagram to show feeding behavior patterns of the pea aphids before and after alteration to different host plants. Colors represent the ratios of individuals entering a certain feeding step in a group of aphids (30 individuals per group).