Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 18;6:19161. doi: 10.1038/srep19161

Table 1. Comparison of recent graphene/QD and graphene/TMDC hybrid photodetectors (room temperature).

Reference Material Gain RI (A/W) D* (cm.Hz1/2/W) Response time Light source and min. power
Konstantatos et al. 2012. [Ref. 16] Graphene/PbS-QD 108 5 × 107 7 × 1013 τ ON~10–20 ms τ OFF~0.1–1 sec 532 nm laser,~10−9 mW/cm2
Sun et al. 2012 [Ref. 20] Graphene/PbS-QD N/A 1 × 107 N/A τ ON~0.3 sec τ OFF~1.7 sec 895 nm LED, 14.5 nW/cm2
Zhang et al. 2012 [Ref. 21] Graphene/PbS-QD N/A 1.7 × 103 N/A not specified, estimated > 10sec halogen lamp, 200 μW/cm2
Roy et al. 2013 [Ref. 18] Graphene/MoS2 4 × 1010 (Low-T) 5 × 108 N/A ~1 sec 635 nm LED, 1 fW/μm2
Zhang et al. 2014 [Ref. 19] Graphene/MoS2 108 1.2 × 107 N/A No dynamic response reported 650 nm laser, 0.01 W/cm2