Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 18;6:19233. doi: 10.1038/srep19233

Table 5. The metagenome analysis tools included in this benchmark.

Tool Version Taxonomy Function Fastq Zipped Paired
CLARK 1.1.3 Yes No Yes Yes Yes
EBI NA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Genometa 0.51 Yes No Yes No Yes
GOTTCHA 1.0a Yes (E) No Yes No Yes
Kraken 0.10.4 beta Yes No Yes Yes Yes
LMAT 1.2.4 Yes Yes No No Yes1
MEGAN2 5.7.0 Yes Yes Yes No (No)3
MetaPhlAn 2 Yes (E) No Yes Yes Yes
MetaPhyler 1.25 Yes No No No Yes4
MG-RAST 3.3.6 Yes (E) Yes Yes Yes (Yes)5
mOTU NA Yes No Yes Yes Yes
One Codex NA Yes (E) No Yes Yes Yes
QIIME6 1.8.0 Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Taxator-tk 1.2.1 Yes No No No Yes7

For each tool, it is shown if it does taxonomic analysis (tools that can also infer Eukaryotic taxa are noted with an “(E)”) and/or functional analysis, and whether it can analyze Fastq files directly, if you can use zipped input files, and if it utilizes paired end information.

1You need to concatenate the input files with an N between paired reads.

2Input to MEGAN was generated using the aligner Diamond (v0.6.3) from the same group.

3MEGAN supports paired end data. However, Diamond does not explicitly support this.

4Each file is treated separately, but the final results can be combined by the tool.

5The server recognizes paired end data but seems to treat reads separately.

6QIIME is highly flexible and can handle both zipped and unzipped fastq files, and both single- and paired-end reads. However, in this analysis we adapted QIIME to work with fasta output from HMMER and could not use these features.

7Although no direct support, the authors provided a way to use the paired information (see Supplementary Material section 2.10 for details).