Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 31;35(6):748–756. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.6.748

Table 3. Effect of proximate composition and salinity on reduced-salt frankfurters formulations with various types of seaweed.

Treatments1) Moisture content (%) Protein content (%) Fat content (%) Ash content (%) Salinity (%)
Control 61.51±0.37a 14.07±0.93 23.28±0.14d 1.52±0.12c 1.93±0.06a
T1 52.48±0.31d 14.11±0.86 29.19±0.63a 1.48±0.04c 1.53±0.06c
T2 60.49±0.10b 13.51±0.47 24.64±0.73d 1.87±0.02a 1.74±0.05b
T3 60.86±0.17b 13.74±0.57 23.31±1.50d 1.86±0.08a 1.72±0.04b
T4 55.31±0.02c 13.70±0.47 28.84±0.21b 1.66±0.11b 1.71±0.05b
T5 56.81±1.03c 14.73±1.49 26.63±0.47c 1.61±0.11b 1.70±0.04b

All values are mean±standard deviation of three replicates (n=9).

a-dMeans within a column with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

1)Control, frankfurter with 1.5% NaCl; T1, frankfurter with 1.0% NaCl; T2, frankfurter with 1.0% NaCl + 1.0% sea tangle; T3, frankfurter with 1.0% NaCl + 1.0% sea mustard; T4, frankfurter with 1.0% NaCl + 1.0% hijiki; T5, frankfurter with 1.0% NaCl + 1.0% glasswort.