Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 31;35(6):748–756. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.6.748

Table 6. Effects of textural attributes on reduced-salt frankfurters formulations with various types of seaweed.

Treatments1) Hardness (kg) Springiness Cohesiveness Gumminess (kg) Chewiness (kg)
Control 0.64±0.06a 0.85±0.03 0.44±0.03 0.29±0.02a 0.25±0.02a
T1 0.46±0.04c 0.82±0.03 0.44±0.03 0.21±0.03c 0.17±0.03c
T2 0.35±0.04d 0.83±0.03 0.40±0.02 0.14±0.03d 0.12±0.03d
T3 0.37±0.05d 0.85±0.04 0.43±0.03 0.16±0.02d 0.13±0.02d
T4 0.49±0.07c 0.82±0.05 0.43±0.03 0.21±0.02c 0.16±0.03c
T5 0.58±0.05b 0.82±0.03 0.46±0.04 0.26±0.03b 0.22±0.03b

All values are mean±standard deviation of three replicates (n=9).

a-dMeans within a column with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

1)Control, frankfurter with 1.5% NaCl; T1, frankfurter with 1.0% NaCl; T2, frankfurter with 1.0% NaCl + 1.0% sea tangle; T3, frankfurter with 1.0% NaCl + 1.0% sea mustard; T4, frankfurter with 1.0% NaCl + 1.0% hijiki; T5, frankfurter with 1.0% NaCl + 1.0% glasswort.