Skip to main content
. 2004 Mar 15;10(6):899–902. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i6.899

Table 4.

Comparison of laboratory abnormalities among AFL, NAFL and control groups (%)

Biochemical Index AFL group (n = 28) NAFL group (n = 301) Control group (n = 163)
TG (≥ 1.7 mmol/L) 2(7.1)a 169(56.2)c 27(17.7)
CHOL (≥ 5.2 mmol/L) 2(7.1)a 148(49.2)c 35(22.9)
HDL-C (≤ 1.0 mmol/L) 9(32.1)a 35(11.6) 27(17.7)
LDL-C (≥ 2.6 mmol/L) 12(42.9)a 214(71.1) 97(63.4)
Apo AI (≤ 1.2 mmol/L) 13(46.4) 118(39.2) 45(29.4)
Apo B (≥ 1.1 mmol/L) 4(14.3)ac 149(49.5)e 53(34.6)
UA (≥ 452 mg/dL) 5(17.9) 89(29.6)e 18(11.8)
AST (≥ 40 U) 12(42.9)ac 51(16.9) 24(15.7)
ALT (≥ 40 U) 10(35.7)c 87(28.9)e 26(17.0)
AST/ALT ( < 1) 11(39.3)c 168(55.8)e 31(20.3)
(≥ 2) 5(17.9)a 15(5.0)e 40(26.1)
ALB (≤ 35 g/L) 3(10.7) 9(3.0) 7(4.6)
GLB (≥ 30 g/L) 3(10.7) 32(10.6) 20(13.1)
A/G (≤ 1.5) 7(25.0) 64(21.3) 31(20.3)
GGT (≥ 50 U/L) 10(35.7) 95(31.6)e 30(19.6)
TBIL (≥ 17.1 μmol/L) 6(21.4) 50(16.6) 30(19.6)
a

P < 0.05, vs NAFL group;

c

P < 0.05, vs control group;

e

P < 0.05, vs control group.