. 2016 Feb;137(Suppl 2):S167–S175. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2851O

TABLE 1.

Participant Characteristics for Children Who Received FA and FCT Treatment via Different Service Delivery Models

Variables	Group 1: In-Home Therapy, 1996–2009 (n = 44)	Group 2: Clinic Telehealth, 2009–2012 (n = 20)	Group 3: Home Telehealth, 2012–2014 (n = 30)	P
Age: mean (SD), mo	48.20 (15.44)	50.30 (15.53)	52.43 (17.45)	.491
Range, mo	22–83	29–80	21–84
Gender	13 F, 31 M	1 F, 19 M	5 F, 25 M	.060
Primary diagnosis, n (%)
ASD	13 (30%)^a	20 (100%)^b	30 (100%)^b	<.001^c
Other DD	31 (70%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)
ID, n (%)	42 (95%)^a	10 (50%)^b	15 (50%)^b	<.001^c
Distance from Children’s Hospital
Mean (SD), miles	67.02 (40.33)^a	200.75 (95.25)^b	116.23 (77.85)^d	<.001^c
Range, miles	3–158	39–317	3–310
Social function identified, n (%)^e
Escape	36 (82%)	13 (65%)	17 (57%)	.056
Tangible	33 (75%)^a	16 (80%)^a ^b	29 (97%)^b	.035^c
Attention	19 (43%)^a	2 (10%)^b	3 (10%)^b	.001^c

F, female; M, male.

When there were significant between-group differences, groups with the same superscript in the same row did not differ from each other.

Significant differences were based on ANOVA for continuous variables and χ² (or Fisher’s exact test for small cell sizes) for categorical variables.

When there were significant between-group differences, groups with the same superscript in the same row did not differ from each other.

Children often had >1 social function.