Table 6. Performance across variation in fixed inputs.
Inputs | Method | MAD | NOTFront | PU20% | PO20% | rs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No fixed inputs | DEA | 0.068 | 11.8% | 0.0% | 42.6% | 0.863 |
rDEA | 0.025 | 2.7% | 1.5% | 7.2% | 0.955 | |
rSDF-CD | 0.106 | 0.0% | 50.2% | 10.5% | 0.762 | |
ENS | 0.055 | 0.0% | 25.8% | 6.3% | 0.936 | |
With fixed inputs | DEA | 0.075 | 8.9% | 2.7% | 41.5% | 0.887 |
rDEA | 0.047 | 2.2% | 18.9% | 8.9% | 0.930 | |
rSDF-CD | 0.099 | 0.0% | 48.0% | 9.7% | 0.774 | |
ENS | 0.061 | 0.0% | 32.7% | 4.8% | 0.928 |
Note: Numbers in bold highlight the best outcome for each performance indicator across the alternative approaches. MAD: median absolute deviation, NOTFront: percentage of misclassified DMUs, PU20%: percentage of underestimation, PO20%: percentage of overestimation, rs: Spearman’s rank correlation.