Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 11;46(20):10868–10874. doi: 10.1021/es3025353

Table 2.

CRA Framework3,9

phase steps tasks
planning, scoping, and problem formulation planning and scoping define purpose, scope, participants, approach, resources, experience
problem formulation develop conceptual model (i.e., define sources, stressors, pathways/routes, receptors, end points), develop analysis plan (i.e., describe methods, models, data gaps, uncertainties), and define appropriate risk metrics (i.e., define outcomes or benchmarks related to adversity and consequences, countervailing risks, risks and benefits)
possible outcomes discuss possible outcomes to ensure scope and methods align with needs of the assessment
analysis integration of exposure, hazard, and dose–response information consider time-related aspects (i.e., time sequence or life-stage), vulnerability (i.e., susceptibility to harm), and subpopulations with special exposure
In order of increasing complexity:
  1. Evaluate single stressor information (i.e., evaluate toxicologic independence and toxicologic similarity)

  2. Evaluate multiple stressor information (i.e., evaluate stressor interactions and joint chemical toxicity)

  3. Develop measures and metrics (i.e., develop decision indices, probabilistic approaches, qualitative approaches, common metrics, biomarkers)

interpretation and risk characterization risk description describe risk (i.e., describe probability of harm based on central tendency or high-end risk, individual vs population risk, risk to important subpopulations)
uncertainty analysis be explicit about uncertainty (i.e., describe uncertainty vs variability, uncertainty and risk addition, sensitive parameters)