Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 27;16:15. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0191-7

Table 6.

Estimated logit coefficients from the multinomial logit model (coefficients and standard errors in brackets)

Over/Underestimate logit
Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3 Strategy 4 Strategy 5
“Over” at average Mean IOP −1.141*** 0.648** −0.408 −0.441 −0.167
(0.346) (0.285) (0.279) (0.282) (0.258)
“Under” at average Mean IOP −0.483* −0.926** −0.776** −0.821*** −1.361***
(0.272) (0.452) (0.313) (0.318) (0.393)
“Over” True Value Coefficient 0.137 0.080 0.104 −0.096 −0.011
(0.095) (0.100) (0.083) (0.092) (0.079)
“Under” True Value Coefficient 0.052 0.355*** 0.070 0.063 0.113
(0.083) (0.126) (0.095) (0.087) (0.102)
Hits 36/70 21/70 33/70 33/70 33/70
Overestimates 12/70 38/70 22/70 22/70 28/70
Underestimates 22/70 11/70 15/70 15/70 9/70

The first two rows report the odds of Overestimates (first row) an Underestimate (second row) with respect to the Hits at the average Mean IOP value. The third and fourth rows report the logit coefficients for Over and Underestimate for the Mean IOP Value (i.e. how the odds vary with the real Mean IOP value). Asterisks represent the significance level according to the legend in the footnotes. The second half of the table reports the actual Hits, Over and Underestimate counts for each strategy

Note: *p < 0.1; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01