Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 27;11(1):e0145978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145978

Table 2. The number and percentage horizon scanning topics that deal with the following topics or issues: climate change; socio-political issues or policy; human demographic issues (population size etc.); human related systems (including agriculture, human settlements, human-dominated landscapes, infrastructure etc.); freshwater systems (e.g., freshwater, rivers, water market etc.); marine systems; ecosystem services; cross-boundary issues (political boundaries, neighboring countries etc.); descriptive questions: those that describe and study problem/threat; proactive questions: questions that deal with solutions and action to address problem.

The table provides the number and percentage of horizon scanning topics in each category. A horizon scanning topic can belong to none, a single or more than one category.

Israel horizon scanning1 UK (2008) horizon scanning2 Global (2010) horizon scanning 3 Global (2011) horizon scanning4 Global (2012) horizon scanning5 Global (2013) horizon scanning6 Global (2014) horizon scanning7
Focus of project Biodiversity conservation Biodiversity conservation Biodiversity conservation Biodiversity conservation Biodiversity conservation Biodiversity conservation Biodiversity conservation
Number of topics selected 8 25 15 15 15 15 15
Climate change 2 (25%) 11 (44%) 7 (46.7%) 6 (40%) 5 (33.3%) 3 (20%) 4 (26.7%)
Socio-political issues 3 (37.55%) 10 (40%) 1 (6.7%) 3 (20%) 1 (6.7%) 0 (0%) 5 (33.3%)
Human demography 1 (12.5%) 2 (8%) 0 (0%) 1 (6.7%) 1 (6.7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Human related systems 5 (62.5%) 7 (28%) 6 (40%) 6 (40%) 8 (53.3%) 7 (46.7%) 6 (40%)
Freshwater systems 1 (12.5%) 5 (20%) 4 (26.7%) 4 (26.7%) 4 (26.7%) 4 (26.7%) 2 (13.3%)
Marine systems 3 (37.5%) 7 (28%) 8 (53.3%) 4 (26.7%) 6 (40%) 4 (26.7%) 4 (26.7%)
Ecosystem services 0 (0%) 3 (12%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6.7%) 0 (0%)
Cross-boundary issues 1 (12.5%) 1 (4%) 1 (6.7%) 1 (6.7%) 0 (0%) 1 (6.7%) 3 (20%)
Descriptive: describe and study problem/threat 4 (50%) 21 (84%) 12 (80%) 13 (86.7%) 9 (60%) 5 (33.3%) 7 (46.7%)
Proactive: deal with solutions/actions to address problem 4 (50%) 8 (32%) 6 (40%) 2 (13.3%) 7 (46.7%) 10 (66.7%) 9 (60%)

Sources (Table 2):

1. This paper.

2. Sutherland WJ, Bailey MJ, Bainbridge IP, Brereton T, Dick JTA, Drewitt J, et al. (2008) Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning. J Appl Ecol 45: 821–833.

3. Sutherland WJ, Clout M, Cote IM, Daszak P, Depledge MH, Fellman L, et al. (2010) A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2010. Trends Ecol Evol 25: 1–7.

4. Sutherland WJ, Bardsley S, Bennun L, Clout M, CôtéIM, Depledge MH, et al. (2011) Horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2011. Trends Ecol Evol 26: 10–16.

5. Sutherland WJ, Aveling R, Bennun L, Chapman E, Clout M, Côté IM, et al. (2012) A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2012. Trends Ecol Evol 27(1): 12–18.

6. Sutherland WJ, Bardsley S, Clout M, Depledge MH, Dicks LV, Fellman L, et al. (2013) A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2013. Trends Ecol Evol 28(1): 16–22.

7. Sutherland WJ, Aveling R, Brooks TM, Clout M, Dicks LV, Fellman L, et al. (2014) A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2014. Trends Ecol Evol 29(1): 15–22.