Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Nov 25;222(2):138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.11.013

Table 5.

Axillary Ultrasound as a Predictor of Extent of Pathologic Nodal Disease Burden

First author No. with
axillary US
Pathologic nodal status by US results p Value
Pathologic nodal
status
Negative US, n
(%)
Suspicious US, n
(%)
Kwak23* 323 SLNB pN0 129 (88) 127 (72) 0.002
pN1 17 (12) 35 (20)
pN2-3 1 (1) 14 (8)
Abe19 559 pN0 291 (77) 69 (38)
pN1 77 (20) 62 (34)
pN2-3 10 (3) 50 (28)
Damera24 166 pN0 45 (71) 57 (55)
pN1 17 (27) 27 (26)
pN2-3 1 (2) 19 (18)
Hinson25 112 pN0 37 (73) 17 (28)
pN1 14 (27) 25 (41)
pN2-3 0 19 (31)
Nori26 132 pN0 78 (77) 12 (39)
1-2 positive nodes 21 (21) 13 (42)
>2 positive nodes 2 (2) 6 (19)
Current 242 pN0 - - 0.005
1-2 positive nodes 160 (88) 43 (70)
>2 positive nodes 21 (12) 18 (30)
*

Axilla imaged with ultrasound, MRI, and/or PET scan. Abnormal nodes on any imaging modality included.

US performed on patients identified as being high risk for nodal metastasis based on grade III tumors, size ≥1 cm, or grade II and size ≥1.5 cm.

All patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy.

US, ultrasound; SLNB, sentinel lymph node biopsy.