Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 10;4:e09460. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09460

Figure 4. Differential impact of misaligned feeing on PER2-driven rhythms in bioluminescence of the SCN, hippocampus and liver (n = 8 per treatment).

Figure 4.

Representative examples of baseline-subtracted traces of PER2-driven bioluminescence in the SCN (a), hippocampus (HP; b), and liver (c) explants from aligned (black) and misaligned (red) mice. (d) Phase relationship between the first calculated peaks of ex vivo bioluminescence plotted against time of the prior lighting cycle (ZT) shows a significant phase change in the HP and liver. (e) Period of bioluminescence rhythms were determined by sine wave fitting. (f) Damping rates were determined from 6 days in culture. *denotes significant differences (p < 0.05) between aligned and misaligned samples. Box and whisker plots display the median as a line, the 25th to 75th percentiles, and the 10th to 90th percentiles respectively.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09460.009

Figure 4—source data 1. PER2-driven bioluminescence rhythms of mice subjected to aligned and misaligned feeding.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.09460.010