Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 6;24:1025–1034. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2871-x

Table 5.

Results of multivariable logistic-regression analysis of delayed vomiting and nausea among 380 women undergoing AC

Variable Odds ratioa (95 % CI) P value
Delayed vomiting
 Anti-emetic prophylaxis (1-day vs. 3-day regimen)b 3.28 (1.43–7.52) 0.005
 Age (<50 vs. ≥50 years) 1.23 (0.50–3.03) 0.653
 Interaction (anti-emetic prophylaxis) (age) 0.32 (0.09–1.06) 0.062
 Alcohol consumption (never vs. regularly) 0.42 (0.15–1.13) 0.085
 Acute vomiting (yes vs. no) 3.48 (1.65–7.33) 0.001
 Acute moderate-to-severe nausea (yes vs. no) 3.41 (1.66–7.00) 0.0009
Delayed nausea (moderate-to-severe or mild)
 Anti-emetic prophylaxis (1-day vs. 3-day regimen)b 1.56 (1.00–2.43) 0.050
 Age (<50 vs. ≥50 years) 1.29 (0.82–2.02) 0.271
 Alcohol consumption (never vs. regularly) 0.76 (0.33–1.75) 0.521
 Acute vomiting (yes vs. no) 1.07 (0.50–2.33) 0.853
 Acute moderate-to-severe nausea (yes vs. no) 11.6 (4.94–27.2) <0.0001

AC anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide, CI confidence interval

aAn odds ratio larger than 1 indicates an increased likelihood of experiencing delayed vomiting or nausea

bPatients received palonosetron plus dexamethasone on day 1 either with or without dexamethasone on days 2 and 3