Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 24;17(1):22. doi: 10.3390/ijms17010022

Table 3.

Summary of equilibrium and pre-steady-state binding data for hAgo2/G–guide RNA complex formation. Numbers in the first row represent equilibrium measurements (Kd_meas). Numbers in the second column were calculated from the corresponding association and dissociation rate constants (Kd_cal = koff/kon = (k−1/k1) × (k−2/k2) × (k−3/k3)). Differences in Kd values for binary complexes determined via equilibrium and pre-steady-state measurements most probably arise from a slight protein aggregation causing a reduced diffusion rate by 2–3-fold leading to an underestimating of k+1_bin and thus higher Kd values. The numbers given are an average of at least two independent experiments. Most experiments were repeated up to three or four times. Standard deviations are given in brackets. * Data taken from [38]. Details are given in the text.

Substrate Kd_meas (nM) Kd_cal (nM) k1 (M−1·s−1) k−1 (s−1) k2 (s−1) k−2 (s−1) k3 (s−1) k−3 (s−1)
U–guide * 7 ± 0.9 36 0.6 (±0.001) × 108 6.2 ± 0.6 0.26 ± 0.02 0.17 ± 0.02 0.012 ± 5 × 10−4 0.007 ± 1 × 10−4
G–guide 35 ± 0.4 59 0.16 (±0.006) × 108 2 ± 0.6 0.2 ± 0.06 0.54 ± 0.07 0.02 ± 0.01 0.0023 ± 4 × 10−4
OH-G–guide 7 ± 0.5 21 0.27 (±0.005) × 108 2.1 ± 0.08 0.3 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.02 0.013 ± 0.002 0.002 ± 7 × 10−4