Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 20;17(1):134. doi: 10.3390/ijms17010134

Table 1.

Echocardiography results after six weeks of very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) injection.

Parameters Control (n = 10) nVLDL (n = 7) msVLDL (n = 10) p Value
BW (g) 23.8 ± 2.4 22.8 ± 1.7 24.6 ± 2.7 0.1699
HR (bpm) 230 ± 20 237 ± 59 259 ± 38 0.5720
Measurement (mm)
Ao Root 1.71 ± 0.12 1.68 ± 0.07 1.69 ± 0.13 0.9274
LA 1.64 ± 0.23 1.84 ± 0.13 2.18 ± 0.24 $,# <0.0001
IVSd 0.91 ± 0.13 0.76 ± 0.09 * 0.78 ± 0.06 $ 0.0054
LVIDd 3.13 ± 0.30 3.78 ± 0.19 * 3.78 ± 0.20 $ <0.0001
LVPWd 0.87 ± 0.10 0.85 ± 0.16 0.77 ± 0.11 0.2141
LVIDs 2.11 ± 0.33 2.59 ± 0.23 * 2.77 ± 0.36 $ 0.0003
Calculation
EF (%) 62.5 ± 7.7 59.8 ± 8.1 52.9 ± 9.6 $ 0.0529
FS (%) 32.9 ± 5.4 31.5 ± 5.4 27.0 ± 6.5 0.0853
LV Mass (mg) 92.3 ± 13.4 107.6 ± 16.2 102.7 ± 9.0 0.0553
LVEDV (µL) 39.3 ± 8.8 61.3 ± 7.2 * 61.6 ± 7.9 $ <0.0001
LVESV (µL) 15.1 ± 5.7 24.6 ± 5.4 * 29.5 ± 8.6 $ 0.0004

BW, body weight; HR, heart rate; Ao Root, aortic root diameter; LA, left atrium diameter; IVSd, end-diastolic interventricular septum thickness; LVIDd, end-diastolic LV internal dimension; LVPWd, end-diastolic LV posterior wall thickness; LVIDs, end-systolic LV internal dimension; EF, ejection fraction; FS, fraction shortening; LV, left ventricle; LVEDV, LV end-diastolic volume; LVESD, LV end-systolic volume; * Comparisons significant for nVLDL vs. Control; $ Comparisons significant for msVLDL vs. Control; # Comparison significant for msVLDL vs. nVLDL.