Table 3.
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tribe | Tribe A * | Tribe B * | Tribe C | Tribe D * | Tribe E | Tribe F * | Tribe G | Tribe H * | Tribe I | Overall Average |
Criteria | ||||||||||
Location (possible 10 points) | 7 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
Leadership Support (possible 30 points) | 24 | 28 | 9 | 27 | 19 | 26 | 16 | 27 | 18 | 22 |
Community Support (possible 30 points) | 23 | 27 | 9 | 21 | 17 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 16 | 17 |
Capacity/Infrastructure (possible 30 points) | 21 | 28 | 8 | 24 | 10 | 26 | 15 | 19 | 14 | 18 |
Additional Considerations (possible 10 points) | 7 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
TOTAL | 82 | 100 | 37 | 89 | 55 | 90 | 50 | 74 | 55 | 70 |
* designates Tribes that were selected as new Tribal Partners.