Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Feb;24(2):506–515. doi: 10.1002/oby.21338

Table 4.

Adjusted GEE Linear Modelsa Estimating Socially Assigned Gender Expression Group Differences in BMI (kg/m2) Using Lagged Predictors and Repeated Measures from 1996 to 2011 Among Female Adolescents and Young Adults in the Growing Up Today Study1&2


Females # observations=29,406
Base Model Model Adjusted for Sexual Orientation Model Adjusted for Weight-Related Behaviors
B (95% CI) B (95% CI) B (95% CI)

PREDICTORS
Socially Assigned Gender Expression
Very gender conforming Reference Reference Reference
Mostly gender conforming 0.53 (0.28, 0.78) 0.51 (0.25, 0.76) 0.52 (0.27, 0.77)
Gender nonconforming 1.23 (0.74, 1.73) 1.17 (0.65, 1.68) 1.13 (0.64, 1.62)
Age
Age 0.47 (0.46, 0.48) 0.47 (0.46, 0.48) 0.47 (0.46, 0.48)
Age squared −0.03 (−0.03, −0.02) −0.03 (−0.03, −0.02) −0.03 (−0.03, −0.02)
Sexual Orientation
Completely heterosexual Reference Reference
Mostly heterosexual 0.14 (−0.17, 0.45) 0.11 (−0.19, 0.41)
Bisexual 0.50 (−0.43, 1.44) 0.52 (−0.36, 1.40)
Lesbian 0.67 (−0.13, 1.47) 0.65 (−0.15, 1.44)
Weight-Related Behaviors
Dieting 0.24 (0.20, 0.28)
Fasting −0.09 (−0.16, −0.02)
Breakfast −0.16 (−0.23, −0.09)
Fast food 0.07 (0.01, 0.14)
Physical activity −0.01 (−0.02, −0.01)
TV viewing 0.02 (0.01, 0.02)
a

All models control for GUTS cohort, race/ethnicity, mother's income, and mother's BMI at 18 years of age. Bolding indicates statistical significance at P<0.05.