Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;2015(7):CD008671. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008671.pub3

Wang 2011.

Methods Study design: "clinical comparative observation" using randomization
Unit of randomization: the individual (one eye per participant)
Number randomized: 96 participants; 32 participants in each of three groups
Unit of analysis: the individual (one eye per participant)
Number analyzed: 96 participants; 32 participants in each of three groups
Exclusions and losses to follow‐up: none reported
Power calculation: none reported
Participants Country: China
Age (mean): 66 year (range: 38 to 76); not reported by group
Gender: 60 men and 36 women; not reported by group
Ethnicity: not reported
Inclusion criteria:
  1. eyes with cataract complicated with glaucoma

  2. LogMAR visual acuity < 0.8, 3) IOP > 21 mmHg


Exclusion criteria: not reported
Equivalence of baseline characteristics: yes
Diagnoses in participants: not reported
Interventions Intervention 1: combined cataract surgery (phacoemulsification) with IOL implantation and trabeculectomy
Intervention 2: cataract surgery (phacoemulsification) with IOL implantation alone
Intervention 3: trabeculectomy alone
Study follow‐up: 6 months
Outcomes Primary outcome: change in IOP
Secondary outcomes:
  1. visual acuity

  2. anterior chamber depth


Adverse events reported: no
Intervals at which outcomes assessed: 2 weeks and 6 months
Notes Type of study: published
Study period: enrolment from January 2007 to June 2010
Funding source: not reported
Disclosures of interest: not reported
Publication language: Chinese
Subgroup analysis: not reported

IOL: intraocular lens; IOP: intraocular pressure; mmHg: millimeter of mercury.