Table 5.
Characteristics | Number | Model 1
|
Model 2
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | 95% CI | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value | ||
Sex | |||||||
Male vs female | 27 vs 48 | 0.865 | 0.462–1.617 | 0.649 | 1.174 | 0.615–2.242 | 0.626 |
Smoking history | |||||||
Yes vs no | 12 vs 63 | 2.039 | 0.899–4.625 | 0.088 | 1.243 | 0.522–2.959 | 0.623 |
Performance status | |||||||
0–1 vs 2 | 48 vs 27 | 1.456 | 0.866–2.446 | 0.156 | 1.419 | 0.827–2.433 | 0.204 |
HDL-C (mmol/L) | |||||||
≤0.945 vs >0.945 | 28 vs 47 | 0.126 | 0.064–0.247 | <0.001 | |||
HDL-C kinetics | |||||||
Nondecreased | 29 | 0.003 | 0.001–0.018 | <0.001 | |||
Normalized | 19 | 0.13 | 0.002–0.068 | <0.001 | |||
Decreased | 16 | 0.029 | 0.006–0.152 | <0.001 | |||
Nonnormalized | 11 |
Notes: The multivariate Cox hazards analysis for model 1 includes sex, smoking history, performance status and baseline HDL-C, while the model 2 includes sex, smoking history, performance status and HDL-C kinetics. The baseline HDL-C and HDL-C kinetics are the main difference between model 1 and model 2.
Abbreviations: EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.