Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Jul 8;142(4):1264–1276. doi: 10.1037/a0033609

Table 1.

A. Cue
Region Within – Between
(mean ± SEM)
Within – Between
t(23)
High – Low
(mean ± SEM)
High – Low
t(23)
Hippocampus 0.015 ± 0.002 8.8** 0.002 ± 0.005 0.4 (ns)
 CA1 0.016 ± 0.001 10.7** 0.001 ± 0.005 0.3 (ns)
 DG/CA2,3 0.016 ± 0.002 7.4** 0.002 ± 0.005 0.3 (ns)
 Subiculum 0.013 ± 0.003 4.0** 0.002 ± 0.007 0.2 (ns)
 Anterior hippocampus 0.012 ± 0.002 4.8** 0.008 ± 0.006 1.3 (ns)
 Posterior hippocampus 0.019 ± 0.003 6.6** −0.003 ± 0.005 −0.6 (ns)
ERc 0.014 ± 0.003 4.9** 0.007 ± 0.007 1.1 (ns)
PRc 0.016 ± 0.002 7.0** 0.007 ± 0.007 1.0 (ns)
PHc 0.014 ± 0.002 5.8** 0.002 ± 0.005 0.4 (ns)
B. Stimulus Encoding
Region Within – Between
(mean ± SEM)
Within – Between
t(23)
High – Low
(mean ± SEM)
High – Low
t(23)
Hippocampus 0.011 ± 0.002 4.7** 0.016 ± 0.004 3.7**
 CA1 0.015 ± 0.002 8.1** 0.007 ± 0.005 1.3 (ns)
 DG/CA2,3 0.010 ± 0.002 4.2** 0.008 ± 0.006 1.4 (ns)
 Subiculum 0.012 ± 0.003 3.9** 0.018 ± 0.005 3.3**
 Anterior hippocampus 0.013 ± 0.004 3.5** 0.002 ± 0.007 0.3 (ns)
 Posterior hippocampus 0.011 ± 0.002 6.0** 0.014 ± 0.005 2.7*
ERc 0.009 ± 0.003 3.0** 0.016 ± 0.006 2.8*
PRc 0.008 ± 0.002 4.1** 0.024 ± 0.006 3.9**
PHc 0.008 ± 0.002 3.9** 0.033 ± 0.008 3.9**

Note.

A. Similarity statistics during anticipatory cue.

B. Similarity statistics during stimulus encoding.

Within – Between = within-reward-state similarity – between-reward-state similarity

High – Low = high-value within-reward-state similarity – low-value within-reward-state similarity.

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01, ns = non-significant