Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 29;10:1. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00001

Table 1.

Quantitative comparison of sample ERPs with existing literature.

Our study Other studies
Number of ERPs assessed 10 Four: Kappenman and Luck, 2012, typically One or Two
Sample ERP Effect sizes of example ERP components
C1 −1.0±0.44 μV −3.2±0.4 μV
N = 18 N = 18
(Cohen's d = 2.27) (Cohen's d = 8), Fu et al., 2010
N170 3.43 ± 2.38 μV −7.85±1.43 μV
N = 18 N = 14
(Cohen's d = 1.44) (Cohen's d = 1.73), Rossion and Caharel, 2011
ERN −2.3±1.42 μV −3.65±2.10 μV
N = 18 N = 40
(Cohen's d = 1.62) (Cohen's d = 1.74), Hajcak and Simons, 2008
P300 3.23 ± 1.49 μV 10.75 ± 4.63 μV
N = 18 N = 15
(Cohen's d = 2.17) (Cohen's d = 2.32), Shaikh et al., 2013