Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 20;2(1):e000171. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000171

Table 4.

Summary of evidence for disease-related and psychological predictors of adherence to MTX

Predictor Study N Adherence outcome Unadjusted effect size (95% CI)/univariate analyses p Value Adjusted effect size (95% CI) p Value
RA duration
Years Salt and Frazier29* 108 Non-adherent (MARS ≤38) NP NP OR 1.00 (1.01 to 1.00) 0.83
Waimann et al30 107 Adherence (MEMS) r 0.08 >0.20 NP NP
1–5 de Thurah et al26 941 Non-adherence (CMG) β 0.03 (0.01 to 0.06) Sig β 0.01 (−0.01 to 0.04) NS
>5 de Thurah et al26 941 Non-adherence (CMG) β 0.02 (−0.01 to 0.04) NS β −0.04 (−0.07 to −0.02) Sig
>5 de Thurah et al27 85 Non-adherence (CQR ≤25th centile) at BL PR 1.7 (0.7 to 4.1) NS PR 1.5 (0.5 to 4.7) NS
>5 de Thurah et al27 65 Non-adherence (CQR ≤25th centile) at 9 mo PR 1.5 (0.6 to 3.6) NS PR 1.2 (0.4 to 3.1) NS
Inflammatory biomarkers
CRP Contreras-Yanez et al24* 93 Adherent (CQ ≥9) vs non-adherent (CQ ≤8) 2.4±2.6 vs 2.6±2.4 0.68 NP NP
CRP 8–32 de Thurah et al26 941 Non-adherence (CMG) β 0.00 (−0.02 to 0.02) NS β −0.02 (−0.04 to 0.01) NS
CRP >32 de Thurah et al26 941 Non-adherence (CMG) β −0.02 (−0.05 to 0.01) NS β −0.04 (−0.07 to −0.02) Sig
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate Contreras-Yanez et al24* 93 Adherent (CQ ≥9) vs non-adherent (CQ ≤8) 24.1±17.4 37.5±23.8 0.003 NP NP
Disease Activity Score-28
Contreras-Yanez et al24* 93 Adherent (CQ ≥9) vs non-adherent (CQ ≤8) 3.6±1.3 vs 5.1±1.9 ≤0.001 NP NP
Waimann et al30 90 Per cent of adherent (MEMS) r −0.27 0.01 NP NP
Sharp score Waimann et al30 79 Per cent of adherent (MEMS) r −0.06 >0.20 NP NP
Functional ability
HAQ de Klerk et al22*,‡ 127 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) ANOVA (no data) NS NP NP
Contreras-Yanez et al24* 93 Adherent (CQ ≥9) vs non-adherent (CQ ≤8) 0.2±0.4 vs 0.4±0.5 0.04 NP NP
HAQ >1.75 de Thurah et al27 85 Nonadherence (CQR ≤25th centile) PR 1.2 (0.5 to 2.5) NS PR 1.4 (0.6 to 3.1) NS
0.75–1.75 de Thurah et al27 65 Non-adherence (CQR ≤25th centile) at BL PR 1.5 (0.5 to 4.9) NS PR 0.8 (0.2 to 3.3) NS
HAQ >1.75 de Thurah et al27 65 Non-adherence (CQR ≤25th centile) at 9 mo PR 0.8 (0.3 to 2.5) NS PR 1.0 (0.2 to 3.4) NS
Modified—HAQ Waimann et al30 107 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) r −0.20 0.04 NP NP
Comorbidity
Number of comorbidities Waimann et al30 107 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) r −0.06 >0.20 NP NP
Per cent with comorbidity Contreras-Yanez et al 24* 93 Adherent (CQ ≥9) vs non-adherent (CQ ≤8) 40% (85) vs 36% (78.3) 0.43 NP NP
Any vs none de Thurah et al27 85 Non-adherence (CQR ≤25th centile) at BL PR 1.3 (0.4 to 3.9) NS PR 1.1 (0.4 to 3.3) NS
de Thurah et al27 65 Non-adherence (CQR ≤25th centile) at 9 mo PR 1.3 (0.4 to 3.8) NS PR 2.2 (0.5 to 9.7) NS
COPD de Thurah et al26 941 Non-adherence (CMG) β 0.00 (−0.04 to 0.04) NS β 0.04 (0.00 to 0.07) Sig
Diabetes de Thurah et al26 941 Non-adherence (CMG) β −0.04 (−0.1 to 0.02) NS β 0.00 (−0.05 to 0.05) NS
Liver disease de Thurah et al26 941 Non-adherence (CMG) β 0.06 (0.02 to 0.10) Sig β 0.04 (0.00 to 0.08) Sig
BMQ low concern about MTX de Thurah et al27 85 Non-adherence (CQR ≤25th centile) at BL PR 0.8 (0.4 to 1.8) NS PR 0.7 (0.3 to 1.8) NS
de Thurah et al27 65 Non-adherence (CQR ≤25th centile) at 9 mo PR 0.5 (0.2 to 1.2) NS PR 0.5 (0.2 to 1.3) NS
BMQ high perceptions of MTX necessity de Thurah et al27 85 Non-adherence (CQR ≤25th centile) at BL PR 0.4 (0.1 to 0.8) Sig PR 0.3 (0.1 to 0.8) Sig
de Thurah et al27 65 Non-adherence (CQR ≤25th centile) at 9 mo PR 0.2 (0.1 to 0.6) Sig PR 0.4 (0.1 to 1.1) NS
LTMBS (self-efficacy) de Klerk et al22 127 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) F 5.9 0.02 NP NP
UCL avoidant coping de Klerk et al22*,‡ 127 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) NP NS β −0.41 < 0.05
Passive reactive coping
UCL passive coping de Klerk et al22*,‡ 127 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) NP NS β 0.79 <0.05
UCL reactive coping de Klerk et al22*,‡ 127 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) NP NS β 0.4 <0.05
UCL active coping de Klerk et al22*,‡ 127 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) NP NS NP NP
UCL reassuring thoughts de Klerk et al22*,‡ 125 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) NP NS NP NP
Mental health
CES-D10 Waimann et al30 107 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) r −0.19 0.05 NP NP
MOS SF-12 MCS Waimann et al30 107 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) r 0.34 <0.01 NP NP
MOS social support Waimann et al30 107 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) r 0.17 0.08 NP NP
Health-related quality of life
European Quality of Life Measure de Klerk et al22*,‡ 127 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) F 5.42 <0.01 NP NP
RA Quality of Life Measure de Klerk et al22*,‡ 81 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) F 0.21 0.65 NP NP
Nottingham Health Profile de Klerk et al22*,‡ 127 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) NP NS β −0.62 <0.05
MOS SF-12 Physical Component Summary Waimann et al30 107 Per cent of adherence (MEMS) r 0.07 >0.20 NP NP

*Studies judged low quality.

†MTX adherence.

‡Includes RA, PMR and gout.

9 mo, 9 months; ANOVA, analysis of variance; BL, baseline; BMQ, Beliefs in Medicines Questionnaire; CES-D10, Centre of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; CMG, continuous medication gap; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CQ, Compliance Questionnaire; CQR, Compliance Questionnaire—Rheumatology; CRP, C reactive protein; F, ANOVA test statistic; HAQ, Health Assessment Questionnaire; MARS, Medication Adherence Revised Scale; MEMS, Medicine Event Monitoring System; MOS, Medical Outcomes Study; MTX, methotrexate; NP, not presented; NS, non-significant; PR, prevalence ratio; r, Pearson correlation coefficient; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SF-12 MCS, Mood Component Summary of MOS 12-item Short Form Health Survey; Sig, significant; UCL, Utrecht Coping List; β, regression coefficient.