Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 28;16:6. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0164-5

Table 3.

Estimates of linear mixed model over 20 days for flossing and flossing Intentions as a function of intervention (N =112)

Model parameters for flossing 95 % CI
Fixed effects (intercept, slopes) Estimate (SE) t p Lower Bound Upper Bound
 Intercept 1.02 (0.13) 8.04 <0.01 0.08 1.27
 Group 0.87 (0.18) 4.84 <0.01 0.52 1.23
 Time −0.02 (0.13) −0.14 0.89 −0.27 0.24
 Group x Time −0.76 (0.18) −4.15 <0.01 −1.13 −0.40
Estimates of covariance parameters for flossing Wald’s z
 Repeated Measures Var1 0.04 (0.13) 0.28 0.78 0.00 38.06
 Repeated measures Var2 0.35 (0.14) 2.56 0.01 0.17 0.76
 Intercept + time (subjects) 0.28 (0.08) 3.71 <0.01 0.16 0.47
Model parameters for intentions 95 % CI
Fixed effects (intercept, slopes) Estimate (SE) t p Lower Bound Upper Bound
 Intercept 1.12 (0.16) 7.09 <0.01 0.80 1.43
 Group 1.04 (0.22) 4.70 <0.01 0.60 1.47
 Time −0.38 (0.18) −2.19 0.03 −0.73 −0.04
 Gender 0.77 (0.26) 2.98 0.003 0.26 1.28
 Group x Time −0.56 (0.23) −2.44 0.02 −1.02 −0.11
 Group x Gender −0.93 (0.28) −3.37 <0.01 −1.48 −0.38
 Time x Gender 0.06 (0.25) 0.23 0.82 −0.43 0.54
Estimates of covariance parameters for intentions Wald’s z
 Repeated Measures Var1 0.36 (0.17) 2.16 0.03 0.15 0.90
 Repeated measures Var2 0.84 (0.20) 4.28 <0.01 0.53 1.33
 Intercept + time (subjects) 0.14 (0.08) 1.68 0.09 0.04 0.44

All p values are two-tailed except in the case of variances, where one-tailed p-values are used (because variances are constrained to be non-negative). Time is coded 0 = baseline, 1 = follow-up. Group is coded 0 for the control group and 1 for the treatment group