Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 29;6:2036. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02036

Table 3.

Correlations11.

Stress variable Coefficient (r or rs) Overall r/rs (p) N Females r/rs (p) N Males r/rs (p) N
Behavioral variable Risk-taking frequency (task) r 0.18 (0.006) 195 0.29 (0.004) 84 0.20 (0.017) 111
Risk-taking (self-report) TICS r 0.10 (0.094) 195 0.24 (0.014) 84 0.035 (0.360) 111
Investment % rs 0.01 (0.453) 183 −0.06 (0.312) 79 0.09 (0.189) 104
Risk-taking frequency (task) rs 0.15 (0.141) 51 0.18 (0.221) 21 −0.02 (0.461) 30
Risk-taking (self-report) HCC (pg/mg) rs 0.14 (0.158) 51 0.07 (0.380) 21 0.04 (0.408) 30
Investment % rs 0.21 (0.081) 47 0.03 (0.452) 20 0.31 (0.060) 27
Stress variable TICS HCC (pg/mg) rs −0.16 (0.260) 51 −0.18 (0.437) 21 −0.14 (0.459) 30

The table displays appropriate correlation coefficients for either Pearson (r) or Spearman (rs) tests, as well as the sample size for each correlation analysis (second line, under the parentheses, denoted by N). Correlations significant at the 0.05 level are denoted by “*” and those significant at the 0.01 level by “**”.