Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 5;2(1):cou020. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cou020

Table 1:

Comparison of day 3 of exposure with recovery for each group in the second experiment (ES2)

Control
Synechococcus sp. CC9902
Synechococcus sp. CC9311
Day 3 of exposure (n = 8) Recovery (n = 7) Day 3 of exposure (n = 9) Recovery (n = 9) Day 3 of exposure (n = 10) Recovery (n = 9)
Time spent in dark zone (s) 365 ± 70 373 ± 38 344 ± 48 292 ± 64 448 ± 60 331 ± 54*
Mean velocity (cm s−1) 6.5 ± 1.6 7.9 ± 1.1 4.4 ± 0.7 5.9 ± 0.9 4.1 ± 0.7 6.5 ± 0.7*
Meandering (° cm−1) 1381 ± 261 1363 ± 391 1473 ± 229 1450 ± 312 2110 ± 351 1169 ± 211*
Time spent immobile (s) 293 ± 51 216 ± 46 361 ± 28 237 ± 51 374 ± 40 209 ± 48*
Time spent in middle zone (s) 111 ± 24 97 ± 23 215 ± 43 155 ± 49 135 ± 42 144 ± 35
Number of zone transitions 20.3 ± 7.7 23.1 ± 4.9 14.0 ± 3.7 19.3 ± 4.3 7.2 ± 2.8 22.2 ± 3.5**

*Time spent in the dark zone: statistically significant difference from 300 s, P < 0.05. All other parameters: statistically significant differences among treatments (Student's unpaired t tests or Mann–Whitney U tests, P < 0.05). **P < 0.01.