Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 29.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Plan A. 2016 Jan 6;48(1):172–191. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15597907

Table 3.

PLM Model Parameter Estimates (Std. Errors)

I (Without inclusion of spatially lagged independent variables) II (With inclusion of spatially lagged independent variables)
Unemployment 0.669 (0.027) *** 0.373 (0.032) ***
Female-Headed Household 0.325 (0.018) *** 0.290 (0.018) ***
Less than High School Education 0.195 (0.015) *** 0.280 (0.024) ***
Extractive Industry 0.195 (0.023) *** 0.111 (0.027) ***
Manufacturing Industry −0.155 (0.018) *** −0.060 (0.022) **
Trade Industry 0.166 (0.020) *** 0.055 (0.028) *
Service Industry --- ---
African American/Black 0.005 (0.034) −0.022 (0.033)
Hispanic/Latino 0.172 (0.021) *** 0.076 (0.024) **
Lag of Unemployment --- 0.195 (0.052) ***
Lag of Less than High School Education --- 0.118 (0.034) ***
Lag of Extractive --- −0.158 (0.050) **
Lag of Manufacturing --- −0.314 (0.036) ***
Lag of Trade --- 0.011 (0.058)
Lag of Service --- ---
1990 --- ---
2000 −0.003 (0.048) −0.009 (0.005) +
2008 0.005 (0.068) 0.012 (0.007) +
Spatial Error Parameter
Pseudo-R2 0.895 0.902
N=9312

In each instance, “Lag” refers to a spatial lag computed using a row-standardized 1st-order Queen spatial weights matrix. Significance codes: ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘+’ 0.1