Table 4.
Demographic Factors Associated With Thwarted Belongingness
| Variable | All (N = 373)a
|
Male (N = 195)
|
Female (N = 178)
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thwarted belonging, M (SEM)* | LR | LR test, p | Thwarted belonging, M (SEM) | LR | LR test, p | Thwarted belonging, M (SEM) | LR | LR test, p | |
| Age | 7.70 | .006 | — | 5.49 | .019 | — | 4.42 | .036 | |
| Gender | 4.09 | .043 | |||||||
| Male | 2.57 (0.08) | ||||||||
| Female | 2.32 (0.09) | ||||||||
| Religion | 8.68 | .035 | 7.80 | .050 | |||||
| Hindu | 2.33 (0.07) | Ref. | 2.20 (0.09) | ||||||
| Christian | 2.75 (0.16) | .111 | 2.93 (0.30) | ||||||
| Buddhist | 2.78 (0.18) | .084 | 2.64 (0.37) | ||||||
| Other | 2.92 (0.55) | .682 | 3.27 (0.92) | ||||||
| Employment status | 3.32 | .069 | |||||||
| Yes | 2.51 (0.08) | ||||||||
| No | 2.39 (0.09) | ||||||||
| Literacy (read/write) | 7.20 | .066 | 8.10 | .043 | |||||
| Both | 2.40 (0.07) | 2.18 (0.10) | .078 | ||||||
| English only | 1.94 (0.38) | 1.27 (0.13) | .187 | ||||||
| Nepali only | 2.47 (0.14) | 2.09 (0.33) | .274 | ||||||
| Neither | 2.61 (0.14) | 2.60 (0.16) | Ref. | ||||||
| Health | 21.90 | <.001 | 14.37 | .002 | 11.58 | .028 | |||
| Excellent/very good | 2.07 (0.11) | <.001 | 2.05 (0.14) | <.001 | 2.09 (0.16) | .194 | |||
| Good | 2.44 (0.11) | .001 | 2.57 (0.13) | .033 | 2.19 (0.20) | .096 | |||
| Fair | 2.40 (0.08) | <.001 | 2.62 (0.13) | .113 | 2.20 (0.11) | .010 | |||
| Poor | 2.81 (0.15) | Ref. | 2.89 (0.21) | Ref. | 2.75 (0.21) | Ref. | |||
Note. LR = Likelihood Ratio; Ref. = reference group.
a
Models were run on a subset of 373 individuals that had complete information for all variables analyzed.