Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0147655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147655

Table 3. Comparisons of adjusted KABC-II scores among the three TCDD exposure groups.

TCDD groups Low Moderate High Comparison ANOVA Effect size
Age Gender Scales Mean SE Mean SE Mean SE High-Low P-val
All age Boys Number of subjects 85 11 7
NVI 91.8 1.6 83.8 4.5 77.0 6.2 * 0.034 0.076
Seq/Gsm 102.7 1.8 109.0 5.1 103.1 7.0 0.515 0.014
Sim/Gv 96.4 2.2 84.6 6.3 86.6 8.6 0.163 0.037
Girls Number of subjects 57 10 11
NVI 94.7 2.1 94.7 5.1 98.1 5.0 0.818 0.006
Seq/Gsm 109.5 2.2 106.2 5.3 105.6 5.2 0.739 0.008
Sim/Gv 94.0 2.4 92.6 5.7 99.2 5.6 0.647 0.008
5-year-olds Boys Number of subjects 74 10 6
NVI 89.7 1.6 81.4 4.4 74.0 6.4 * 0.024 0.093
Seq/Gsm 102.5 1.9 107.6 5.2 101.5 7.3 0.634 0.010
Sim/Gv 94.9 2.3 92.1 6.4 85.8 9.0 0.151 0.043
Girls Number of subjects 47 10 11
NVI 94.3 2.4 93.5 5.3 96.7 5.2 0.892 0.004
Seq/Gsm 108.9 2.6 107.3 5.7 108.5 5.4 0.969 0.003
Sim/Gv 92.1 2.7 93.3 6.0 101.0 5.7 0.392 0.018

High TCDD group: TCDD ≥ 3.5 pg/g lipid, Moderate TCDD group: 2.5–3.5, Low TCDD group: < 2.5,

SE: standard error, N: number of subjects, NVI: Non Verbal Index,

Seq/Gsm: Sequence/General ability of short term memory, Sim/Gv: Simultaneous/General ability of visual processing

ANOVA P-value: compared by General Linear Model after adjustment for month-age, gestational age, birth weight of infant, maternal age, family income, parents' education years.

*: P<0.05: compared with low TCDD group